À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4338   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4453/5609
2015-12   1124169   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   4575481   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2007-02   4443   À弮ȯ
2007-02   5008   ±è°æ¼ö
2007-02   4257   À̵¿°ü
2007-02   4823   ÀÌö
2007-02   4614   ¹ÚÇö±Ù
2007-02   4286   ¼ºÅ±â
2007-02   5184   ±èÁ¾±¸
2007-02   4442   ¼Õ¼®¿ì
2007-02   4922   ±èÁ¤¿í
2007-02   4237   °­Çö¼·
2007-02   5530   ÀÌÁØÈ£
2007-02   4397   ÀÌ»ó±â
2007-02   4209   ÀÌ»ó±â
2007-02   4104   Á¤¸í±â
2007-02   5420   ÇÑŵ¿
2007-02   5025   ¿À¼º±â
2007-02   4522   ±èÁ¤°­
2007-02   4688   ÀÌÀº±Ô
2007-02   4550   ¹ÚÂùÇõ
2007-02   4856   ÀåÁø¼ö