À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4755   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 2333/5714
2014-05   5186724   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1719808   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2017-05   4754   ¾Æ¸§µå¸®¼Ò¡¦
2017-09   4754   ¸¶Åë
2007-05   4754   ±èÇå¿í
2017-04   4754   ¸Ó¶óÄ«´Âµ¥
2014-05   4754   ¹æoÈ¿o¹®
2016-04   4754   NAS°íÀå³µ´Ù¡¦
2014-05   4754   ²¤Àð
2006-09   4754   ±è»ó¿ì
2016-02   4754   e5472
2012-08   4754   ¹Ú¼º¸¸
2016-06   4754   ¹Ì¼ö¸Ç
2007-06   4754   ÀÌâÁØ
2016-07   4754   NeOpLE
2016-10   4754   Àü»êÀ¯Ã¼Çؼ®
2016-12   4754   ´«¶áºÀ»ç
2014-06   4755   À׿©
2006-12   4755   À±Ä¡¿­
2016-11   4755   Ȳ¼ºÁø
2016-10   4755   ½½·¯±×
2007-05   4755   À̸íÈÆ