À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4513   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 2357/5663
2015-12   1436253   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   4897435   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2016-07   4513   epowergate
2008-11   4513   ¼ÛÀçÈÆ
2017-04   4513   jore
2016-05   4513   ¾ËÆÎ
2017-10   4513   ºí·ç¸ð¼Ç
2007-01   4514   À̱æ¿ø
2007-05   4514   À̸íÈÆ
2018-08   4514   susemi
2015-04   4514   ´Ù´Ï¿¤Çìµù
2016-12   4514   Çϼ¿È£ÇÁ
2012-11   4514   ¹Ú¼º¸¸
2007-06   4514   ¹Úö¿ì
2007-03   4514   ±Ç¿ëÀÏ
2021-02   4514   ±¸½ÊÆò
2014-10   4514   Èû³»ÀÚ
2006-01   4514   ±èÇüÇÊ
2007-01   4514   ÀÌÁøÇü
2016-11   4514   ½½·çÇÁ
2016-07   4514   ǪÇÏÈ÷
2015-03   4514   ´Ï²Ù»×