À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4623   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 2368/5696
2014-05   5028434   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1565029   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2019-02   4622   ¼ÛÁÖÇü
2007-05   4622   ÃÖºÀÇö
2016-07   4622   À̹®¿µ
2014-03   4622   2cpumem
2012-05   4622   ¹æoÈ¿o¹®
2012-07   4622   À̱ԹÎ
2017-06   4622   »ê°ñ³óºÎ
2017-05   4622   À̼±±Ô
2014-08   4622   ¹Ú¼º¸¸
2014-04   4622   ¹Ì´ã
2016-10   4623   ½½·¯±×
2013-11   4623   µàÇÐ
2021-06   4623   Åë½Å¹öÇÊ
2018-11   4623   ha2mil
2007-03   4623   ±èÀç¹Î
2014-07   4623   ±èµ¿¹Î
2007-03   4623   ±è´ë¼º
2017-10   4623   µÎcpu
2019-04   4623   Smile
2007-07   4623   ±ÇÈñ¼®