À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4936   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã ޽ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇϰÔ.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 2368/5750
2015-12   1888106   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   5374055   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2006-07   5041   ÀÌÁ¾¿ø
2015-02   5041   ¼­¹Ì
2016-09   5041   ÄĹÚ
2007-03   5041   ÇÏâ¼®
2016-07   5041   ǪÇÏÈ÷
2007-01   5041   ¹Ú¿ì¿­
2007-04   5041   ÇãÁøÇü
2008-10   5041   ÀÓÁ¾¿­
2017-04   5041   »Ç»ÇÁß
2015-06   5041   Áø¿äÇÑ
2007-07   5041   ÀÌÁ¤Âù
2012-11   5041   ÃÖâÇö
2007-04   5042   ¹ÚÇö
2014-04   5042   ¾¾Çü
2007-05   5042   ½É´ë¿µ
2013-02   5042   ±èÁöȯ1
2012-03   5042   ¿ì¾Ó»Ñ¾Ó
2006-12   5042   ÀÌÀç¼®
2016-04   5042   ¾Æ¸¶µ¥¿ì¾²
2016-05   5042   ¹«¾Æ