À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4554   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 2369/5682
2015-12   1488792   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   4952226   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2019-01   4554   crogym
2016-03   4554   ¹ÌÄ£°õ
2015-08   4554   ÀÌÀ¯Á¾
2016-10   4554   ¼ø¯
2018-10   4554   Nikon
2016-12   4554   ¼­¿ï»ç¶÷
2019-06   4555   DDDIE
2015-05   4555   ±è¿µ±â
2013-01   4555   ¹Ú¹®Çü
2018-06   4555   ¿ìÁÖ°í¾çÀÌ
2006-12   4555   Á¤Áø±â
2014-01   4555   À©µµ¿ì10
2021-08   4555   ¹Ý¼º¸¸
2014-07   4555   ÀÌÀ¯Á¾
2015-02   4555   À嵿°Ç2014
2016-04   4555   evoker
2016-10   4555   whitestar88
2014-05   4555   ö
2006-12   4555   À±ÁØÇü
2020-01   4555   ºò³Ê±¼¸Ç