À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4597   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 2372/5688
2014-05   5005021   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1540769   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2016-08   4601   cclim
2014-03   4601   2cpumem
2014-08   4601   ÃÖ¼Ö¹Î
2017-04   4601   Beth
2013-01   4601   ³²¹Ù¿Ï
2015-03   4601   ¿Ï¼ÒÈƳ²
2014-10   4601   ºýÁ¾
2016-11   4601   Jjun
2016-05   4601   ¾ËÆÎ
2016-10   4602   ½½·¯±×
2008-11   4602   ±è½ÂÈÆ
2007-03   4602   ±èÀç¹Î
2015-03   4602   kking
2013-11   4602   ¹Ú³²±Ô
2014-01   4602   ±è¿ë¿î
2014-07   4602   ¼ÇÇѸÆÁÖ
2016-09   4602   ¸¼ÀººÎö
2016-03   4602   JK±èµ¿¿í
2015-01   4602   ±¸Äí¸£±×
2016-10   4602   ÆíÇѼ¼»ó