À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4657   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 3345/5699
2015-12   1638370   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   5101801   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2006-09   4657   ¹ÎºÀ±â
2016-08   4657   ¹è»ó0¿ø
2006-08   4657   ±èÁÖ¿µ
2016-02   4657   Ä«¹Ì³ª±â
2016-08   4657   ȸ¿øK
2015-06   4657   izegtob
2015-02   4657   ·¹ÀÌÀú¯
2016-02   4657   À©µå·¯³Ê
2014-11   4657   °ø»çºÒ½Å
2016-11   4657   Àο¬
2014-09   4657   ÇÏ´ÃÇÏ´Ã
2016-12   4657   Çϱվƺü
2015-01   4657   AKAÁö´Ï
2007-01   4656   À±È£¿ë
2014-12   4656   ¼ÒÇ϶û
2007-08   4656   ³²¼º·æ
2007-01   4656   ÀÌÁ¤Ç¥
2007-04   4656   ¹Ú±¤´ö
2007-08   4656   À¯Á¦¿¬
2016-05   4656   ÇູÇϼ¼