À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4520   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 419/5664
2015-12   1442024   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   4903467   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2004-08   7439   ³ª°­¹®
2005-02   6052   ±èÇÑÁØ
2004-05   8286   Â÷´ëºÀ
2004-03   8076   È«µ¿±Ç
2006-11   4574   ±èÇö±¹
2007-08   5559   ±èÀçÇå
2006-03   5318   ÀÌÁØ°ø
2007-01   4668   ÀÌ°æÀç
2007-12   5473   ±èÇö¿ì
2006-12   4434   Çѵμº
2007-01   4521   ÀÌÁø¼ö
2007-07   5359   ¹ÎºÀ±â
2003-01   11653   ±è¿µ¹Î
2006-07   5363   ÇÏ»óÇÊ
2003-05   11192   ÁøÁ¾Çö
2006-04   7052   ¹æÈ¿¹®
2008-07   5112   ¹®º´Ã¤
2005-12   4004   ¹Úµ¿¼·
2006-07   5194   ±èº´¿ì
2006-08   4473   ±èÀç½Ä