À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4507   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4468/5663
2015-12   1429101   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   4890127   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2007-04   4536   Á¤ÀºÁØ
2007-04   4629   ÇÏâ¼®
2007-04   5193   ¹Úµ¿¼·
2007-04   4839   ±è´ë¼º
2007-04   4310   ÇÏâ¼®
2007-04   3982   À±Ä¡¿­
2007-04   4800   À±È£¿ë
2007-04   4871   ÃÖÁÖÈñ
2007-04   4379   ¿À¼º±â
2007-04   4310   ¹ÚÁØÇõ
2007-04   4874   Á¤ÈûÂù
2007-04   4190   ¹®Ãß±â
2007-04   5463   ÀÌ»óµ·
2007-04   4610   ¼­¿ëȯ
2007-04   4853   ¹ÚÀ翵
2007-04   4945   ÀÌ»óµ·
2007-04   4720   ¾ç»ó¿ë
2007-04   4022   ¹®Ãß±â
2007-04   4090   ¹ÚÇö
2007-04   4484   ±èº´¿ì