À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4511   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4471/5663
2014-05   4896647   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1435465   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2007-04   4561   À±°æ½Ä
2007-04   4128   ±èº´±Ô
2007-04   4325   ¹ÚÇö
2007-04   4540   ¼Û½Âȯ
2007-04   7544   ÀÌ¿µ½Ä
2007-04   4640   ¼­¿ëȯ
2007-04   4408   ¹®Ãß±â
2007-04   4589   Á¤ÀºÁØ
2007-04   4819   À±Ä¡¿­
2007-04   5401   ±èÀçÆò
2007-04   5515   ±èº´¿ì
2007-04   4618   ¹ÚÇö
2007-04   5063   ¼º½Ãâ
2007-04   6524   ÀåÇö¸ð
2007-04   4648   ÀÌ»óµ·
2007-04   4583   ÇÏâ¼®
2007-04   4165   ¹ÚÁؼö
2007-04   4867   ¾ÈâÁØ
2007-04   4948   ¹ÚÁ¾¿ë
2007-04   4551   À̼ºÁØ