À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4521   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4473/5664
2014-05   4904132   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1442683   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2007-04   4372   ³²°æ¸²
2007-04   4801   È«Á¤È¯
2007-04   3944   ÇÏâ¼®
2007-04   4546   È«¼øö
2007-04   4332   Á¶¿µÅÃ
2007-04   3869   Á¶Á¤¿ì
2007-04   4629   ±èÅ°æ(ÀÎõ)
2007-04   5258   ÀÌÀÎ
2007-04   4522   À̱¤·¡
2007-04   4685   ÀÌ»ó·æ
2007-04   4780   ¼Û¿µ¿À
2007-04   4296   ±è½Â¿ë
2007-04   4286   ÀÌÀçÈ£
2007-04   4432   ±è½Â¿ë
2007-04   4231   ±è¿µÈ£
2007-04   4622   ÇÑâ¼ö
2007-04   8637   ³ëÇü¼®
2007-04   4331   ±èµÎÈ«
2007-04   4314   À±ÇѽÅ
2007-04   4225   ·ù±âÁß