À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4404   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4477/5637
2014-05   4749966   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1295157   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2007-02   4603   À±±ÍÁø
2007-02   4554   ÀÌÇØ¿ø
2007-02   4166   ÀÌ°©¼º
2007-02   3993   ÇѸí¼ö
2007-02   4616   Çѵ¿ÈÆ
2007-02   4673   Á¤µµ¿µ
2007-02   4087   À̱â¹é
2007-02   4248   õÈñ½Â
2007-02   4349   ½É±Ô»ó
2007-02   4470   ¼º½Ãâ
2007-02   4246   ¼Õ¼®¿ì
2007-02   4475   ¼­¿ëȯ
2007-02   4355   À±È£¿ë
2007-02   5608   ±è´ë¼º
2007-02   4316   Çѵ¿ÈÆ
2007-02   3947   ¼Õ¼®¿ì
2007-02   4518   ÀÌ°©¼º
2007-02   5089   ±èÃá±æ
2007-02   4564   ÃÖÁ¾Çå
2007-02   4875   °ûÅ¿µ