À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4446   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4484/5653
2015-12   1383372   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   4838810   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2007-03   4237   ³²°æ¸²
2007-03   4535   Çѵ¿ÈÆ
2007-03   4687   ±è»óÀÏ
2007-03   4582   ±èÀç¹Î
2007-03   4460   À±ÇѽÅ
2007-03   4762   ¹ÎºÀ±â
2007-03   4194   ¼­¿í
2007-03   4852   ÀÓöÇõ
2007-03   4816   ¹ÚÁ¾¼º
2007-03   4507   ±èÀçÇå
2007-03   4730   ÀÌÈñ¿ø
2007-03   4698   ±èÁرÔ
2007-03   4407   ÃÖ¿¬ÁØ
2007-03   4835   À±È£¿ë
2007-03   4254   À±È£¿ë
2007-03   4156   Á¤ÀçÈÆ
2007-03   8889   ±èÇöÈ£
2007-03   3985   À̱æ¿ø
2007-03   5029   ÀÌÁ¦È£
2007-03   4411   ³ëÇü¼®