À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4944   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã ޽ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇϰÔ.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4546/5752
2014-05   5380053   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1894325   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2007-05   5225   ±èâÀ±(WC)
2007-05   4652   ¿À¼º±â
2007-05   10810   °ûÅ¿µ
2007-05   5028   ±èÀç½Ä
2007-05   5072   À̽ÂÇå
2007-05   5054   ±èŰæ(ÀÎõ)
2007-05   5016   ÀÌ±æ¿ø
2007-05   4873   ±èÁ¤¿í
2007-05   5539   Çѵ¿ÈÆ
2007-05   4947   ÇÑÅÂÈ£
2007-05   5278   ¿ì½Â¿±
2007-05   5113   ±è¿ëÈÆ
2007-05   4663   À̱¤·¡
2007-05   5693   ³²°æ¸²
2007-05   5429   µµ¼®¸²
2007-05   5709   Á¶Áß¿¬
2007-05   7166   À¯»ç¿ë
2007-05   5054   ¼­¿ëȯ
2007-05   4928   ¼ÛÈ­½Ä
2007-05   5720   ÀÌ»óµ·