À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4946   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã ޽ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇϰÔ.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4546/5753
2014-05   5382348   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1896809   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2007-05   4768   ±èÁ¾¼º
2007-05   5888   ¹®º´Ã¤
2007-05   4687   À±È£¿ë
2007-05   4812   È«Á¤È¯
2007-05   5650   ±èº´¿ì
2007-05   4944   ±èÇå¿í
2007-05   5060   ±èÇѱ¸
2007-05   4905   ÃÖ¸¶·ç
2007-05   4962   ³²°æ¸²
2007-05   5397   Çѵμº
2007-05   4987   ±è¼±´ë
2007-05   5595   ¹èµ¿°ü
2007-05   4705   ¼ÒÇöÁØ
2007-05   5225   ±èâÀ±(WC)
2007-05   4658   ¿À¼º±â
2007-05   10814   °ûÅ¿µ
2007-05   5028   ±èÀç½Ä
2007-05   5072   À̽ÂÇå
2007-05   5055   ±èŰæ(ÀÎõ)
2007-05   5018   ÀÌ±æ¿ø