À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4550   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 5273/5681
2015-12   1487263   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   4950588   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2008-07   5478   ¿À°æ¼®
2006-03   5184   ¾ÈâÁØ
2002-10   14333   °­´ë¼·
2007-01   4862   Çѵμº
2004-07   7867   ±èÁÖÀÏ
2003-02   11518   ±èµ¿¿í
2006-05   5593   À̱Ôâ
2004-09   6630   ¿ø³«¿¬
2006-07   5685   ¾ÈâÁØ
2007-08   5699   À±È£¿ë
2002-08   13764   ÃÖâÇö
2004-06   8097   Ãֱ⿵
2006-01   5089   À±Á¾¿Ï
2003-07   12408   ¹Ú»óÇü
2006-03   6011   ÀÓöÇõ
2004-04   8373   ±èÇö½Â
2004-08   7462   ³ª°­¹®
2005-02   6077   ±èÇÑÁØ
2004-05   8309   Â÷´ëºÀ
2004-03   8091   È«µ¿±Ç