À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4683   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 5279/5706
2014-05   5130411   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1665240   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2005-12   5633   Çѵ¿ÈÆ
2008-01   5030   ÇÏâ¼®
2004-06   7947   ÇѸí¼ö
2007-05   5181   Á¤¸í±â
2006-09   5087   ÃÖ°æ¹Î
2007-07   7358   ±è¼®Áß
2006-06   5991   ¹Ú¿ë¼±
2004-08   6971   ¿ø³«¿¬
2008-05   6125   Çѵ¿ÈÆ
2008-09   5173   ¼ÛÈ­½Ä
2004-11   13390   ±èµ¿¹ü
2007-12   4952   ÀÌÁøÇü
2008-05   6830   ¹æÈ¿¹®
2005-07   5840   ±èÇØÁø
2002-10   11083   ±è¹ÎÈ£
2003-09   8193   Á¤ºÀ¿ø
2008-07   5426   ¹Ú¿ë¼±
2002-09   12443   È«ÇѼ®
2005-10   5724   ÀÌ»óÇö
2006-07   5072   À̺´Çå