À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4738   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 5280/5709
2015-12   1686250   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   5151754   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2004-06   7288   ¼ÛÈ­½Ä
2005-03   6820   ±èÁÖ¿ø
2007-07   5195   õÈñ½Â
2006-11   4689   À±È£¿ë
2002-11   11916   ÀÌ´ë¿ì
2005-03   6535   ºÀÀçÈÆ
2006-08   5446   ÃÖâÇö
2004-04   7904   ½ÅÀ¯È£
2003-05   10359   ÀÌ⹬
2003-09   8210   °­°æ¸ð
2007-09   4718   Á¤ÀÇÇÑ
2006-01   5409   ÀÓÇö±Ô
2008-07   5181   ¹æÈ¿¹®
2003-12   10326   ³²±âÀÏ
2008-08   5412   °í¿µ¹Î
2005-12   5654   ¿À½ÂÁØ
2003-04   11295   À±¿µ¼±
2002-12   11522   ¾çÇѺó
2003-08   10725   ±èµ¿·Ä
2004-08   6736   À±È£¿ë