À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4955   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã ޽ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇϰÔ.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 5281/5754
2014-05   5388775   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1903710   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2008-09   4852   ±è½ÂÇö
2002-12   11247   º¯¿µÈ£
2005-03   6540   À̼ö¹Î
2005-03   6819   ±èâ¶ô
2008-06   6035   À±È£¿ë
2005-01   7136   ±è±â¹ü
2005-03   6607   ½ÅÀ¯È£
2004-06   7958   ÇÑâ¼ö
2004-12   7122   ¼ÕÀçÁØ
2008-06   5593   Çϼö¾ð
2005-05   6125   °èÀ¯Âù
2005-12   5453   À±¿µ¹è
2006-07   5851   ±èÇüÁÖ
2008-07   5701   ¹ÚÀ§·Õ
2006-01   5548   ¾ÈâÁØ
2005-02   7083   ¿À¼¼Áø
2008-05   6108   ¹ÚÀç¼®
2006-02   6304   ±èÁ¤Çõ
2003-06   11242   Á¶¿ëÁØ
2008-07   6064   ±ÇÁ¾ÀÏ