À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4612   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 5281/5691
2014-05   5016415   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1551879   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2003-07   8438   ±èÁ¤Áß
2007-01   4673   ¾ÈâÁØ
2005-05   7444   ¼Û»óº´
2006-12   5229   À±Á¾¿Ï
2007-08   4965   ³²±ÃÀϳ²
2008-06   6834   À¯À翵
2003-08   9117   Á¤¿µÀç
2006-08   5486   Á¤º´ÁÖ
2007-09   4868   ±èµ¿¹Î
2002-06   15754   ¹Ú¹Î¼ö
2005-08   5792   ¾ÈâÁØ
2006-12   4646   ¿ì½Â¿±
2003-01   11873   ±èÇöÈ£
2006-10   5432   À±È£¿ë
2006-12   4127   ±è¿ë¿í
2006-01   5107   ¿°Àçµµ
2008-06   5952   ¿ø³«¿¬
2007-07   5232   ±è¼®Áß
2007-09   5136   Á¶¸í¼ö
2008-07   5286   ¹ÚÀç¼®