À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4558   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4532/5682
2015-12   1489950   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   4953468   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2017-02   7805   3001N6
2004-06   7805   ¼­Áß¼º
2016-03   7805   »Ú»ß
2014-07   7806   ¿¹°ü½Å±Ô½Ä
2016-08   7806   ±èÁØÀ¯
2006-03   7806   Á¤¼ºÈÆ
2013-01   7806   ¹Ì¼ö¸Ç
2005-10   7806   À̼ºÁØ
2005-10   7807   ÃÖÁ¾Çå
2016-03   7807   ³ë½º¿ìµå
2005-09   7807   ¹Ú±âÇö
2009-10   7807   º´¸ÀÆù
2016-05   7808   ȸ¿øK
2011-03   7808   ±è¼ºÈ£
2011-03   7808   ½Ì¾î¼Û¶óÀÌÅÍ
2011-03   7808   Á¶¸í¼ö
2003-12   7808   ¼Û»óº´
2004-07   7808   ±è±â¹ü
2004-06   7809   ½ÉÀåÇö
2011-07   7809   ±è¿µ±â