À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4818   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã ޽ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇϰÔ.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4581/5731
2014-05   5267921   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1792936   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2011-02   8037   GodokNam
2012-09   8037   ¹«¾Æ
2021-01   8037   ¼ÛÇö¿ì
2010-09   8037   typer
2009-05   8037   ±èÁÖ¿ës
2016-05   8037   song05
2018-02   8038   ĵÀ§µå
2004-05   8038   ¹ÚÁؼ®
2010-08   8038   ¹Ì¼ö¸Ç
2013-01   8038   ¹Ì¼ö¸Ç
2011-03   8038   ÃÖ¿ø½ÃÀÍ
2010-03   8039   ÃÖºÀÁØ
2009-05   8039   ¹æoÈ¿o¹®
2004-07   8039   ÀÓâ±Ù
2009-04   8039   ¼Û¼®±Ù
2011-01   8039   Â÷Æò¼®
2018-10   8039   ÈçÇѳ²ÀÚ
2010-04   8039   °¡ºü·Î±¸³ª
2004-01   8039   À̽±¸
2011-07   8039   ±è¿µ±â