À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4542   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4528/5678
2014-05   4940699   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1477569   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2004-04   7792   È«¼ºÈ£
2017-01   7792   ¿©ÁÖ³ó¹Î76
2011-03   7792   ÀÌÇö¼®1
2004-04   7793   õ±â¼®
2008-07   7793   °ø¼º¿ø
2015-04   7793   ¹°·Î¸¸µç²Þ
2016-08   7793   ¾Æ¿ì¸¯
2009-04   7793   Ǫ¸ªÀÌ
2010-10   7794   yasu
2011-05   7794   ±è°Ç¿ì
2016-08   7794   ±èÁØÀ¯
2011-07   7795   Áö¸§ÆÒ´õ
2004-06   7795   ¼­Áß¼º
2004-05   7795   ¹ÚÂùÀÏ
2011-07   7796   ±è¿µ±â
2011-02   7796   ¹Ì¼ö¸Ç
2004-12   7796   ¼ÕÀÍ»ó
2013-02   7796   ÀÌ¿øÀçK
2010-03   7796   ¹Ú»ó¹ü
2006-03   7796   Á¤¼ºÈÆ