À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4625   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4547/5696
2015-12   1566216   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   5029650   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2016-12   7871   ²Ü¹è¸À²Ü¹è
2004-06   7871   ÀÌ¿µ¼±
2009-11   7872   ¹Úµ¿¼·
2011-04   7872   µþ±â´ëÀå
2016-03   7872   ³ë½º¿ìµå
2004-03   7872   Â÷Æò¼®
2004-05   7872   ¼ÛÈ­½Ä
2012-02   7872   ±è¼öȯ¹«
2004-05   7872   ÀÓ½ÃÇö
2004-05   7872   °­Èñȯ
2010-10   7872   klein
2004-03   7873   ÀÌÈ¿Áß
2009-11   7873   ±èº´ÀÏ
2010-12   7873   ¹ÚÃ汸
2014-05   7873   ´ëÇѹα¹
2014-08   7873   ¼ÇÇѸÆÁÖ
2011-04   7873   ´ÚÅÍD
2004-03   7873   È«»óÈÆ
2010-04   7873   È«Á¤È¯
2004-02   7873   À̽±¸