À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4816   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã ޽ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇϰÔ.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4580/5730
2014-05   5266249   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1791176   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2010-03   8035   ÀÌÁ¾¿ø
2012-09   8035   ¹«¾Æ
2016-05   8035   song05
2018-02   8036   ĵÀ§µå
2013-06   8036   ±è°Ç¿ì
2012-01   8036   ¶÷Áã¶ó±Ã
2011-01   8036   Â÷Æò¼®
2010-08   8036   ¹Ì¼ö¸Ç
2009-05   8036   ±èÁÖ¿ës
2004-06   8036   ±èÇü¹Î
2015-02   8036   ¿ì¿ì¾¾¾¾¾¾
2004-05   8037   ¹ÚÁؼ®
2011-02   8037   GodokNam
2010-04   8037   °¡ºü·Î±¸³ª
2022-06   8037   hater
2021-01   8037   ¼ÛÇö¿ì
2010-09   8037   typer
2011-07   8037   ±è¿µ±â
2010-03   8038   ÃÖºÀÁØ
2013-09   8038   ÄÄÁö±â