À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4571   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4536/5686
2015-12   1507571   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   4971283   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2004-02   8067   ÀÌÅÂÈÆ
2007-03   4859   À̼ºÁÖ
2007-11   5084   ·ùÀåÈ£
2003-01   10217   ÀÓżº
2003-08   8794   ±èÁöÈÆ
2006-03   5426   ÀÓöÇõ
2006-04   5870   ±è¿µ±â
2007-03   4052   ±èÁ¤Çö
2007-11   5282   ±èÅÂÇö
2003-06   11843   ¿ÀÇü±Ù
2006-10   5409   ¹Ú¹®Çü
2007-03   4814   ÀÌÈñ¿ø
2005-08   5807   ³ëÁ¤·¡
2004-07   7800   ÀÌ¿ø±â
2007-11   5219   ±è°ü½Ä
2002-07   14115   ¹Ú¹®Çü
2008-12   5580   Çѵ¿ÈÆ
2003-02   10490   ±èÅ°æ
2005-11   5688   À¯È£ÁØ
2006-03   5514   ¼Õ¼ºÈ£