À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4549   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4530/5680
2014-05   4946868   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1483530   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2007-02   5200   ±è¿µ³²
2007-04   4983   ÀÌ»óµ·
2004-11   7130   ·ù°æ¿ì
2005-05   6842   ¹ÚÁØ¿ë
2008-03   5439   Á¤¿µÃ¶
2006-04   5220   ¹Ú»ó¿ë
2006-08   4926   ±è¿ì°æ
2007-07   4547   ¹ÚÇö
2002-11   11218   ¹Ú±Õ
2003-05   10800   Á¤ÈûÂù
2003-07   10558   ¹®Ãß±â
2003-09   8057   Çѵ¿ÈÆ
2004-02   8054   ÀÌÅÂÈÆ
2007-03   4836   À̼ºÁÖ
2007-11   5059   ·ùÀåÈ£
2003-01   10202   ÀÓżº
2003-08   8783   ±èÁöÈÆ
2006-03   5368   ÀÓöÇõ
2006-04   5847   ±è¿µ±â
2007-03   3997   ±èÁ¤Çö