À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4827   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã ޽ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇϰÔ.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4585/5735
2015-12   1800206   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   5274925   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2003-05   10976   Á¤ÈûÂù
2003-07   10746   ¹®Ãß±â
2003-09   8255   Çѵ¿ÈÆ
2004-02   8425   ÀÌÅÂÈÆ
2007-03   5252   À̼ºÁÖ
2007-11   5385   ·ùÀåÈ£
2003-01   10389   ÀÓżº
2003-08   8974   ±èÁöÈÆ
2006-03   5756   ÀÓöÇõ
2006-04   6127   ±è¿µ±â
2007-03   4386   ±èÁ¤Çö
2007-11   5697   ±èÅÂÇö
2003-06   12044   ¿ÀÇü±Ù
2006-10   5733   ¹Ú¹®Çü
2007-03   5207   ÀÌÈñ¿ø
2005-08   6038   ³ëÁ¤·¡
2004-07   7956   ÀÌ¿ø±â
2007-11   5516   ±è°ü½Ä
2002-07   14454   ¹Ú¹®Çü
2008-12   5879   Çѵ¿ÈÆ