À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4576   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4536/5686
2015-12   1516585   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   4980515   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2006-05   7825   ÀӹαÔ
2013-02   7825   ¹Ì¼ÒÂï»ç
2011-06   7825   classiccha
2009-04   7825   Ǫ¸ªÀÌ
2013-04   7825   º´¸ÀÆù
2005-10   7825   À̼ºÁØ
2011-01   7826   ±è¹Î¼ö2
2004-01   7826   ºÀÀçÈÆ
2011-07   7826   Áö¸§ÆÒ´õ
2017-06   7826   Landa
2013-07   7826   ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÄÚ
2004-08   7826   Çѵ¿ÈÆ
2011-05   7827   ºý½Ã´Ù
2008-09   7827   ±èÀçÇå
2015-04   7827   izegtob
2019-09   7827   ±¸½ÊÆò
2011-03   7827   Á¶¸í¼ö
2009-05   7828   º´¸ÀÆù
2016-03   7828   ³ë½º¿ìµå
2010-11   7828   ¿ÀŽÂ