À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4824   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã ޽ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇϰÔ.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4585/5735
2014-05   5274279   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1799611   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2010-04   8045   ÀÌÁ¾¿ø
2012-01   8045   ¶÷Áã¶ó±Ã
2011-01   8045   Â÷Æò¼®
2009-12   8045   ±ÇÁ¾ÀÏ
2014-08   8045   Á¦ÁÖ±èÀç¹Î
2009-05   8045   ¹Úµ¿¼·
2004-08   8045   ±è¼ºÁø
2013-09   8046   ÄÄÁö±â
2009-09   8046   ¼Õ¼®¿ì
2010-09   8046   typer
2020-12   8046   ¹Ý¼º¸¸
2004-02   8046   °­Èñ¼ö
2009-04   8047   ¼Û¼®±Ù
2013-02   8047   ¹Ú¿Ï°æ
2009-02   8047   ¹Úº´Èñ
2018-02   8048   ĵÀ§µå
2012-09   8048   ¹«¾Æ
2004-04   8048   ±èÁö¼º
2016-03   8048   º´¸ÀÆù
2011-07   8048   ¹é½Âö