·£Ä«µå´Â ¾îµð·Î °¬´Â°¡? (2)

   Á¶È¸ 8899   Ãßõ 0    

´Ù½Ã È®ÀÎÇÏ°í ¹®ÀÇ µå¸³´Ï´Ù.
º¸µå´Â S5000V SAÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌ´õ³ÝÄ«µå´Â Intel Co. 80003ES2LAN Gigabit Ethernet Controller À̶ó°í Ç¥½Ã°¡ µÇ¾îÀÖ¾î¿ä.(Centos ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ¼³Á¤ »ó¿¡¼­)
eth0, eth1 Àε¥

dmesg |grep e1000
e1000e:Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 0.3.3.3-k4
e1000e:Copyright (c) 1999-2008 Intel Corporation.
e1000e: probe of 0000:05:00.0 failed with error -2
e1000e: probe of 0000:05:00.1 failed with error -2

ÀÌ·¸°Ô ³ª¿À³×¿ä..ÀÌ·¸°Ô ³ª¿À¸é Á¤»óÀûÀ¸·Î ÀνÄÇÑ°Å °°Áö ¾ÊÀºµ¥
¾î¶»°Ô ÇؾßÇϳª¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.
¹Ú¿ì¿­ 2009-10
µ¿ÀÏÁõ»óÀ̽ŰŠ°°Àºµ¥¿ä,

https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=thread&topic_id=19544&forum=40

¸îÀϵ¿¾È »ðÁúÇß´Ù´Â ³»¿ëÁß "2009/4/28 3:57" ¿¡ ´Þ¸° ´ñ±Û¿¡ ³»¿ëÀÌ Àֳ׿ä. ¹Ø¿¡¼­ µÎ¹ø°.
BIOS setting (Advanced/PCI) called IO Acceleration Technology ºÎºÐÀ» Á¶Á¤Çß´Ù°í Çϳ׿ä.
Å×½ºÆ® Çѹø Çغ¸½ÃÁÒ.

https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=thread&topic_id=19544&forum=40&post_id=75286

Sorry for the lengthy delay in posting. I spent several days playing with this problem and I found the solution! There is a BIOS setting (Advanced/PCI) called IO Acceleration Technology. Once I disabled that setting, then all was fine. Being my stubborn self, I was not satisfied with just having it working, I wanted to know what that setting did. I poked around a bit with the setting both enabled and disabled. What I found was that with the setting enabled, It enables both TX & RX checksumming. With the setting disabled, it only enables TX checksumming (as listed by ethtool -k).

Also I was incorrect in my previous post that 5.2 used e1000 driver. I did another load of 5.2 and it was using an older version of e1000e, but that older version did not support the RX checksumming on chip, so it never crashed, however the newer e1000e driver does support it when enabled, but is apparently broken. Turning off RX-Checksumming with the ethtool tool did not have any effect. Only disabling in BIOS made a difference.

So... after boring everyone with my lame diagnosis.... the simple fix (at least for me) was to disable the "IO Acceleration Technology" option in BIOS.

Thanks to Alan for the assistance and giving me some things to look at!!!
±è½ÂÈÆ1 2009-10
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=thread&topic_id=19544&forum=40&post_id=75286

¿©±âÇÔºÁº¸¼¼¿ä. °°Àº ¹®Á¦·Î °í¹ÎÇϽźÐÀÌ ¿Ã¸°°Ì´Ï´Ù.

I spent several days playing with this problem and I found the solution!
There is a BIOS setting (Advanced/PCI) called IO Acceleration Technology.
Once I disabled that setting, then all was fine.
Being my stubborn self, I was not satisfied with just having it working, I wanted to know what that setting did.
I poked around a bit with the setting both enabled and disabled. What I found was that with the setting enabled, It enables both TX & RX checksumming.
With the setting disabled, it only enables TX checksumming (as listed by ethtool -k).

Also I was incorrect in my previous post that 5.2 used e1000 driver.
I did another load of 5.2 and it was using an older version of e1000e,
but that older version did not support the RX checksumming on chip, so it never crashed, however the newer e1000e driver does support it when enabled,
but is apparently broken.
Turning off RX-Checksumming with the ethtool tool did not have any effect. Only disabling in BIOS made a difference.

So... after boring everyone with my lame diagnosis.... the simple fix (at least for me) was to disable the
"IO Acceleration Technology" option in BIOS.

¹ÙÀÌ¿À½ºÀÇ ¼³Á¤ºÎºÐÀ» ºÁº¸½Ã´Â°Ô ÁÁÀ»µíÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÇÔ Âü°íÇغ¸¼¼¿ä.
±è½ÂÈÆ1 2009-10
5ÃÊ Â÷ÀÌÀÔ´Ï´ç. ¹®Àå ¼öÁ¤¾ÈÇßÀ½ »¡¶úÀ»°Çµ­..ÈæÈæÈæ..


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4071/5681
2014-05   4950821   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1487475   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2009-11   11737   À̺´¿µ
2009-11   7445   ´Ù·ÕÀÌ
2009-11   7620   Ǫ¸ªÀÌ
2009-11   13153   ±è°Ç¿ì
2009-11   7736   ±è°Ç¿ì
2009-11   14594   Â÷Æò¼®
2009-11   7657   Àü±ÙÇö
2009-11   13381   ÀÌ´öÈ£
2009-11   8413   Â÷Æò¼®
2009-11   7471   ÀÌÇØÇϸé¿À¡¦
2009-11   6569   °í¿µ´ö
2009-11   9139   ¹Ú
2009-11   8158   ÀåÅÂÁÖ
2009-11   8154   ¹Ú¿ì¿­
2009-10   9296   ¹Ú»ó¹ü
2009-10   7762   ÀÌÁø¼ö
2009-10   8078   ¹Ú»ó¹ü
2009-10   10467   ¹é½Âö
2009-10   9158   ÇÑŵ¿
2009-10   6366   ±èÈ¿¼ö