·£Ä«µå´Â ¾îµð·Î °¬´Â°¡? (2)

   Á¶È¸ 8991   Ãßõ 0    

´Ù½Ã È®ÀÎÇÏ°í ¹®ÀÇ µå¸³´Ï´Ù.
º¸µå´Â S5000V SAÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌ´õ³ÝÄ«µå´Â Intel Co. 80003ES2LAN Gigabit Ethernet Controller À̶ó°í Ç¥½Ã°¡ µÇ¾îÀÖ¾î¿ä.(Centos ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ¼³Á¤ »ó¿¡¼­)
eth0, eth1 Àε¥

dmesg |grep e1000
e1000e:Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 0.3.3.3-k4
e1000e:Copyright (c) 1999-2008 Intel Corporation.
e1000e: probe of 0000:05:00.0 failed with error -2
e1000e: probe of 0000:05:00.1 failed with error -2

ÀÌ·¸°Ô ³ª¿À³×¿ä..ÀÌ·¸°Ô ³ª¿À¸é Á¤»óÀûÀ¸·Î ÀνÄÇÑ°Å °°Áö ¾ÊÀºµ¥
¾î¶»°Ô ÇؾßÇϳª¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.
¹Ú¿ì¿­ 2009-10
µ¿ÀÏÁõ»óÀ̽ŰŠ°°Àºµ¥¿ä,

https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=thread&topic_id=19544&forum=40

¸îÀϵ¿¾È »ðÁúÇß´Ù´Â ³»¿ëÁß "2009/4/28 3:57" ¿¡ ´Þ¸° ´ñ±Û¿¡ ³»¿ëÀÌ Àֳ׿ä. ¹Ø¿¡¼­ µÎ¹ø°.
BIOS setting (Advanced/PCI) called IO Acceleration Technology ºÎºÐÀ» Á¶Á¤Çß´Ù°í Çϳ׿ä.
Å×½ºÆ® Çѹø Çغ¸½ÃÁÒ.

https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=thread&topic_id=19544&forum=40&post_id=75286

Sorry for the lengthy delay in posting. I spent several days playing with this problem and I found the solution! There is a BIOS setting (Advanced/PCI) called IO Acceleration Technology. Once I disabled that setting, then all was fine. Being my stubborn self, I was not satisfied with just having it working, I wanted to know what that setting did. I poked around a bit with the setting both enabled and disabled. What I found was that with the setting enabled, It enables both TX & RX checksumming. With the setting disabled, it only enables TX checksumming (as listed by ethtool -k).

Also I was incorrect in my previous post that 5.2 used e1000 driver. I did another load of 5.2 and it was using an older version of e1000e, but that older version did not support the RX checksumming on chip, so it never crashed, however the newer e1000e driver does support it when enabled, but is apparently broken. Turning off RX-Checksumming with the ethtool tool did not have any effect. Only disabling in BIOS made a difference.

So... after boring everyone with my lame diagnosis.... the simple fix (at least for me) was to disable the "IO Acceleration Technology" option in BIOS.

Thanks to Alan for the assistance and giving me some things to look at!!!
±è½ÂÈÆ1 2009-10
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=thread&topic_id=19544&forum=40&post_id=75286

¿©±âÇÔºÁº¸¼¼¿ä. °°Àº ¹®Á¦·Î °í¹ÎÇϽźÐÀÌ ¿Ã¸°°Ì´Ï´Ù.

I spent several days playing with this problem and I found the solution!
There is a BIOS setting (Advanced/PCI) called IO Acceleration Technology.
Once I disabled that setting, then all was fine.
Being my stubborn self, I was not satisfied with just having it working, I wanted to know what that setting did.
I poked around a bit with the setting both enabled and disabled. What I found was that with the setting enabled, It enables both TX & RX checksumming.
With the setting disabled, it only enables TX checksumming (as listed by ethtool -k).

Also I was incorrect in my previous post that 5.2 used e1000 driver.
I did another load of 5.2 and it was using an older version of e1000e,
but that older version did not support the RX checksumming on chip, so it never crashed, however the newer e1000e driver does support it when enabled,
but is apparently broken.
Turning off RX-Checksumming with the ethtool tool did not have any effect. Only disabling in BIOS made a difference.

So... after boring everyone with my lame diagnosis.... the simple fix (at least for me) was to disable the
"IO Acceleration Technology" option in BIOS.

¹ÙÀÌ¿À½ºÀÇ ¼³Á¤ºÎºÐÀ» ºÁº¸½Ã´Â°Ô ÁÁÀ»µíÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÇÔ Âü°íÇغ¸¼¼¿ä.
±è½ÂÈÆ1 2009-10
5ÃÊ Â÷ÀÌÀÔ´Ï´ç. ¹®Àå ¼öÁ¤¾ÈÇßÀ½ »¡¶úÀ»°Çµ­..ÈæÈæÈæ..


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4091/5700
2014-05   5051209   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1587509   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2009-10   9403   ¹Ú»ó¹ü
2009-10   7847   ÀÌÁø¼ö
2009-10   8157   ¹Ú»ó¹ü
2009-10   10601   ¹é½Âö
2009-10   9233   ÇÑŵ¿
2009-10   6481   ±èÈ¿¼ö
2009-10   10152   ÀϹÝÀ¯Àú
2009-10   6104   psj1050
2009-10   16193   µþ±â´ëÀå
2009-10   6221   ¿ÀŽÂ
2009-10   6316   ÀåÅÂÁÖ
2009-10   8992   À̱â¹é
2009-10   11814   ÀÎÄ¡ÁØ
2009-10   10229   ±èÈ¿¼ö
2009-10   6156   ±è»óÀÏ
2009-10   8224   Ǫ¸ªÀÌ
2009-10   6291   Â÷Æò¼®
2009-10   6427   Ǫ¸ªÀÌ
2009-10   6533   ÀÌ¿µ±Ô
2009-10   14779   ¸¸´É¾ß¸Å