곰삼촌님께서 좋은 자료를 주었지만 영어에 막혀 다시 질문 올립니다. 단순 번역뿐만 아니라 설명도 부탁드립니다. 특히 장점이요. 이게 가장 모르겠어요.
Adaptive Load-Balancing:
This option does not require any additional switch-side configuration.
This mode is everything that balance-tlb is, and more. It has all of the features (and restrictions) of transmit load-balancing, and will also add a layer of decision based on IPv4 addressing.
Pros: All those listed in Transmit Load-Balancing, plus an additional layer based on ARP replies which also makes it so one particular interface is not particularly saturated due to inbound connections.
Cons: Takes more processing power than XOR, Round Robin or Transmit Load-Balancing.
Àúµµ Áö½ÄÀÌ Âª¾Æ¼ Á» ¾Æ¸®¼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù¸¸, ´Ü¼øÈ÷ MAC ¾îµå·¹½º ±â¹ÝÀ¸·Î ºÐ»ê ÀÛ¾÷ÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö´Â°Ô ¾Æ´Ï¶ó IPµµ ÆÇ´Ü¿ä¼ÒÀÇ Çϳª·Î Ãß°¡µÈ´Ù´Â °É·Î Çؼ®ÇÏ½Ã¸é µÉ °Í °°½À´Ï´Ù.(ARP ȸ½ÅÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ´Ù¸é ¸»ÀÌ ¸Â´Â°Å°°½À´Ï´Ù)
¸¹Àº µµ¿òÀÌ µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.
ÀûÀÀÇÏ´Â ³Ý¿öÅ© Æ®·¹ÇÈ ³ª´®: (ÀûÀÀ½Ä ³Ý¿öÅ© load balancing)
This option does not require any additional switch-side configuration.
ÀÌ ¿É¼ÇÀº ½ºÀÄ¡¿¡¼´Â ¾Æ¹« ÀÛ¾÷µµ ÇÊ¿ä·Î ÇÏÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.
This mode is everything that balance-tlb is, and more. It has all of the features (and restrictions) of transmit load-balancing, and will also add a layer of decision based on IPv4 addressing.
ÀÌ ¸ðµå´Â ·Îµå¹ß¶õ½ÌÀÇ ¸ðµç°ÍÀÌÀÚ ±×°ÍÀÇ ÀÌ»óÀÌ´Ù. Àü¼Û·Îµå¹ß¶õ½ÌÀÇ ¸ðµç ±â´É°ú Á¦ÇÑÀ» Çϸç IP ¹öÀü4 ¾îµå·¹½Ì (ÁÖ¼ÒÁöÁ¤ÇÏ´Â)¿¡ ÇϳªÀÇ ·¹À̾ Ãß°¡ÇØÁØ´Ù.
Pros: All those listed in Transmit Load-Balancing, plus an additional layer based on ARP replies which also makes it so one particular interface is not particularly saturated due to inbound connections.
ÀåÁ¡: ¸ðµç tlb ¿Í Ãß°¡µÈ ·¹À̾ (ARP = Address Resolution Protocol) Á¤ÇØÁø ³Ý¿öÅ©(Ÿ°Ù) ÀÎÅÍÆäÀ̽º°¡ Æ÷ȵǴ°ÍÀ» ¹æÁöÇØÁØ´Ù.
Cons: Takes more processing power than XOR, Round Robin or Transmit Load-Balancing.
´ÜÁ¡: XOR, Round Robin ¶Ç´Â Transmit Load-Balancing º¸´Ù´Â ÇÁ·Î¼¼¼¸¦ ´õ ¸¹ÀÌ ¾´´Ù.