µ¿¿µ»ó ÀÎÄÚµù¿ë ±×·¡ÇÈÄ«µå Áú¹® ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

   Á¶È¸ 6202   Ãßõ 0    

지금 중고장터에 

p4000 8g 45만

M6000 12g 67만

H264. H265인코딩용으로 어떤것이 더 좋을까요?

아니면 차라리 비슷한 기격대의 2060이나 2070이

더 좋을지 궁금합니다.


ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.
     
ÀÌÀ¯Á¾ 2019-07
°¨»çÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Âü°í ÇÏ°Ú½À´Ï´Ù.^^
chis 2019-07
nvenc¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ´Ù¸é ÀÏ´Ü Æ©¸µ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃÄ°¡ Ÿ ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃĺ¸´Ù È­ÁúÀÌ ÁÁ´Ù°í ¾Ë·ÁÁ®ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
     
ÀÌÀ¯Á¾ 2019-07
±×·¸´Ù¸é 2060À̳ª 2070ÀÌ ÁÁ°Ú±º¿ä.
Á¤¸» °¨»çÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ^^
Á¶¿ë¿ø 2019-07
titan rtx?
rtx
quadro¾Æ´Ñ°¡¿ä?
°ËÀºÄá 2019-07
Rtx2060ÀÌ °¡¼ººñ ÁÁÀ» °Ì´Ï´Ù.
TuringºÎÅÍ´Â pascal°ú´ÂÈξÀ È­ÁúÀÌ ÁÁÁö¸¸ ¼º´É(±×·¯´Ï±î ÀÎÄÚµù ¼Óµµ)´Â óÂüÇÒ Á¤µµ·Î °¨¼ÒÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

±×¿¡ ´ëÇÑ dev talk ¸µÅ©ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÚ¼¼ÇÑ ¾ê±ä ¿©±â¼­ º¸½Ã±æ..
https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/1038493/video-codec-and-optical-flow-sdk/details-about-nvenc-in-turing-/5
     
ÀÌÀ¯Á¾ 2019-07
2060À» ÀÌ¿ëÇϸé È­ÁúÀº ÁÁ¾ÆÁöÁö¸¸ ÀÎÄÚµù ¼Óµµ´Â À§¿¡ ¾ð±ÞÇÑ p4000À̳ª m6000º¸´Ù´Â ¸¹ÀÌ ¶³¾îÁø´Ù´Â ¸»¾¸Àΰ¡¿ä?
          
°ËÀºÄá 2019-07
±Û Áß°£Á¤µµ¿¡ º¸½Ã¸é

We just put Quadro RTX to production, performance are still poor, but quality is better.

Actualy we have 24x Quadro RTX 5000 in 6 servers, next week We will add another 16x Quadro RTX 5000, so totaly 40 GPUs.

It is very sad, that Quadro RTX 4000, 5000, 6000 has all the same performance in NVENC.

-------Quality vs Performance table for 1080p50 at 3Mbit/s-------


codec parameters GTX fps RTX fps SW fps GTX PSNR RTX PSNR SW PSNR
h264 -bf 3 -preset hq -profile high 2x334 375 8.5 34.817637 35.032718 34.794732
h265 -preset fast 2x430 678 3 34.706381 34.797363 35.776912
h265 -preset hq 2x338 155 1.6 34.719312 35.318421 35.799952
h265 -bf 4 -preset hq - 161 1.6 - 35.768031 35.799952

:::::::::SUMMARY:::::::

1. There is better quality for H264, PSNR +0.2dB (8%), but encoding performance are only 56% of Pascal generation!

2. When compare Pascal preset hq and Turing preset fast, quality is better by +0.1dB (4%) and encoding speed is same (1 NVENC Turing = 2 NVENC Pascal)

3. When we compare high quality profile, encoding performance of Turing are only 24% of Pascal!!!!!!!!! => Not suitable for any 4K content, but quality is almost same as SW libx265, PSNR +1dB (40%)!!!!

So I still don't get why Nvidia didn't put 2xNVENCs on Quadro RTX 5000,6000, it could be killer product.

¶ó°í ³ª¿À³×¿ä. ¹¹.. ¼Óµµ°¡ ÆĽºÄ®¿¡ ºñÇؼ­ ´À¸°°ÅÁö¸¸ ±×·¡µµ SW¿¡ ºñÇؼ± ºü¸£°í Àü±â ¼Ò¸ð·®µµ Àû°í ¿©·¯¸ð·Î À̵æÀÏ °ÍÀ̶ó »ý°¢ÀÌ µå³×¿ä.
Àúµµ À̹ø¿¡ ±×³É cpu¿¡¼­ gpu ÀÎÄÚµùÀ¸·Î °¥¾ÆŸµµ µÇ´Â ºÐ±âÁ¡À̶ó°í »ý°¢ÇÏ°í ³Ñ¾î°¡·Á°í Çϳ׿ä.. ´Ù¸¥ Àü¹®°¡ ºÐµéÀº ¾î¶² »ý°¢ÀÏÁö´Â Àß ¸ð¸£°Ú³×¿ä. Àúµµ ¸Ó Àü¹®°¡´Â ¾Æ´ÑÁö¶ó..^^;;;
               
ÀÌÀ¯Á¾ 2019-07
Ä£ÀýÇÑ ´äº¯ °¨»çÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¸¹Àº µµ¿òÀÌ µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 3843/5682
2015-12   1490951   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2014-05   4954456   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2013-03   6166   ÃÖ½ÂÈñ
2005-09   6167   ¹ÚÁØÇõ
2011-04   6167   ±è°Ç¿ì
2017-11   6167   À¸¶óÂ÷Â÷Â÷
2011-04   6168   Larry
2015-11   6168   ÀÌÇüµ¿
2006-04   6168   À̱⿵
2005-08   6168   Çϼö¾ð
2011-04   6169   À¯È£ÁØ
2019-05   6169   makesound
2017-08   6169   ĵÀ§µå
2010-12   6169   °­¿µ½Ä
2012-01   6169   ¹æoÈ¿o¹®
2005-06   6169   Á¤¸íÇö
2009-09   6169   spooky
2006-12   6169   Á¤ÀºÁØ
2009-04   6170   ¹Úµ¿¼·
2013-12   6170   ȸ¿øK
2010-02   6170   ¼Õ¼®¿ì
2006-07   6170   ÀåÅÂÁÖ