[ MIKROTIK ] ½Å/±¸Á¦Ç°°£ »ç¾ç ºñ±³ - rb962 vs audience vs rb2011

   Á¶È¸ 3207   Ãßõ 0    

하기와 같이 3개의 장비에 대한 상대 성능이 궁금합니다.

실제 BMT 결과 말고, 하기의 CPU / MEM 스펙만 보고 상대 성능치가 가늠이 될 까 해서요


출시년도/가격등을 토대로는

   AUDIENCE >> RB962 >> RB2011 순으로 성능 서열이 나열 될 거 같긴한데

   1. RB962/RB2011 두 제품이 1 Core에 100MHz 정도 차이 밖에 안나는 데, 실제 성능도 대동 소이 할런지요 ?

   2. AUDIENCE는 코어가 무려 4개 인데, 실제 성능도 RB2011/RB962대비 넘사벽 일려나요 ?

   3. 다중 코어의 주된 잇점이 PPS 향상 일려나요 ?


아시는 분의 조언 및 의견 부탁 드려 봅니다.


감사합니다. 


* RB962

[nhsung@capsman-rb962] /system resource> print

                   uptime: 1d21h55m56s

                  version: 6.47.3 (stable)

               build-time: Sep/01/2020 05:24:48

         factory-software: 6.35.4

              free-memory: 77.6MiB

             total-memory: 128.0MiB

                      cpu: MIPS 74Kc V5.0

                cpu-count: 1

            cpu-frequency: 720MHz


* AUDIENCE

[nhsung@cap-audience] > /system resource print

             uptime: 1d21h56m40s

            version: 6.47.3 (stable)

         build-time: Sep/01/2020 05:24:48

   factory-software: 6.45.4

        free-memory: 192.4MiB

       total-memory: 256.0MiB

                cpu: ARMv7

          cpu-count: 4

      cpu-frequency: 716MHz


* RB962

[nhsung@sw-rb2011] > /system resource print

                   uptime: 1d18h44m12s

                  version: 6.47.3 (stable)

               build-time: Sep/01/2020 05:24:48

              free-memory: 97.2MiB

             total-memory: 128.0MiB

                      cpu: MIPS 74Kc V4.12

                cpu-count: 1

            cpu-frequency: 600MHz

ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.
¹Ú°Ç 2020-09
Á¦ÀÏ °£´ÜÇÑ ¹æ¹ý. tools - btest serverÀ» Äѵΰí bandwidth test¿¡¼­ ·çÇÁ¹éÀ¸·Î ½ÇÇàÇؼ­ ºñ±³Çغ¸¸é µË´Ï´Ù.

´ÙÁßÄÚ¾î´Â ¾Æ¹«·¡µµ ¸ÖƼ½º·¹µå·Î 󸮵Ǵ ÀÛ¾÷µéÀ» ³ª´©¾î ó¸®ÇØÁÙ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸´Ï ¼º´ÉÇâ»óÀÌ ÀÖÁö¿ä.
´Ù¼öÀÇ vpnÅͳÎ, ¹æÈ­º®µî... ÀϺΠ½Ì±Û½º·¹µå·Î¸¸ ¼³°èµÈ ÀÛ¾÷µéÀº Ŭ·°ÀÌ ºü¸¥ °ÍÀÌ ³ªÀ»¼ö¹Û¿¡ ¾ø±¸¿ä.
     
³× ´äº¯ °¨»çÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
 btest server¿¡ loopback IP¸¦ ¹Þ°í, ether1-n or bridge¸¦ ±¸¼ºÇؼ­ ECMP 󸮵ǵµ·Ï Ç϶ó´Â Á¶¾ð À̽ŰÅÁÒ ?
          
¹Ú°Ç 2020-09
ÇÑ Àåºñ¿¡¼­ btest server¸¦ ½ÇÇàÇÏ°í enableÇÑ ´ÙÀ½ bandwidth test¿¡¼­ 127.0.0.1 ·çÇÁ¹é IP¸¦ ³Ö¾î¼­ ½ÇÇàÇϸé ÀÏÁ¾ÀÇ ÇÁ·Î¼¼½Ì ÆÄ¿ö º¥Ä¡¸¶Å©°¡ µË´Ï´Ù.
/tool bandwidth-server set authenticate=no
/tool bandwidth-test 127.0.0.1 duration=30s
                    ;;; results can be limited by cpu, note that traffic generation/termination performance might not be representative of forwarding performance
                status: done testing
              duration: 30s
            rx-current: 19.1Gbps
  rx-10-second-average: 19.0Gbps
      rx-total-average: 18.2Gbps
          lost-packets: 0
          random-data: no
            direction: receive
              rx-size: 65520
      connection-count: 20
        local-cpu-load: 100%
      remote-cpu-load: 100%

°¨»çÇÕ´Ï´Ù. »ó±â ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ¾îÂî ¾îÂî Çß½À´Ï´Ù. ²Ù¹÷

°¢°¢ÀÇ °øÀÎ IP¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â Àåºñ·Î´Â ¼­·Î PINGÀº Àß µÇ³ª, CONNECTING »óÅ·θ¸ Àֳ׿ä ~.~
     
ÀÚ´äÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

 B-TEST SERVER¿¡¼­ ÇϱâÀÇ ¸í·É¾î Ãß°¡ ÀÌÈÄ¿¡, Á¤»ó µ¿ÀÛÇÔÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´½À´Ï´Ù. B-TEST send/receive port Ãß°¡
13    ;;; BANDWIDTH TEST SERVER ==========
      chain=input action=accept protocol=udp dst-port=2000
14    chain=input action=accept protocol=tcp dst-port=2000

[nhsung@capsman-rb962] /ip firewall filter> /tool bandwidth-test x.x.x.x duration=30s protocol=udp direction=both
                    ;;; results can be limited by cpu, note that traffic generation/termination performance might not be representative of
                        forwarding performance
                status: running
              duration: 7s
            tx-current: 9.1Gbps
  tx-10-second-average: 5.2Gbps
      tx-total-average: 5.2Gbps
            rx-current: 8.4Gbps
  rx-10-second-average: 6.9Gbps
      rx-total-average: 6.9Gbps
          lost-packets: 0
          random-data: no
            direction: both
              tx-size: 65520
              rx-size: 65520
      connection-count: 20
        local-cpu-load: 100%


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4554/5681
2014-05   4949428   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1486139   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2018-12   3206   Á¤ÀǼ®
2015-04   3205   ±èÁöȯ1
2019-05   3205   ±ÝÄáÄ¿ÇÇ
2014-04   3205   ÀÎÃʸ®
2014-03   3205   judeivan
2019-10   3205   Lucifer
2018-01   3205   ½É»ç¼÷°í
2018-09   3205   KiMACOMM
2018-04   3205   NiteFlite9
2020-01   3205   ¶ó¿ÂÁ¦³ª
2020-05   3205   online9
2019-01   3205   ommn
2018-08   3205   ¿©ÁÖ³ó¹Î76
2018-08   3205   Áøµ¹½´ºó
2017-05   3205   °¡¶÷ÀÌ´ç1
2019-03   3205   ÇູÇϼ¼
2020-07   3204   ¼­¿ï»ç¶÷
2014-03   3204   ³²ÀºÁ¾
2022-03   3204   ½ÅÀº¿Ö
2014-01   3204   ±æ°¡´ø´ººñ